if you can teach your values/morals ( or lack of ) to my children
i should be allowed to teach mine to yours ..... or .....

just teach children the 3 r's and leave the rest to the parents !!

I hate to tell you this, but there is only one TRUE LIVING GOD, who is the Father of Jesus Christ.
This Country wasn't founded to be a Christian Country, but it was Founded on Christian principles, the laws and the Constitution were based on Christian principles....

Look at all the statues etc etc. from back then that was part of government places the were all based on Christianity

yeah, we are not suppose to worship idols, or make images of things that are in heaven

meaning GOD, Angels, etc. I'm not sure if Jesus is included in that or not, because Jesus was made in human form..

fzappa: you are right. all religion results in war. Why? Because every single person on this earth has a religion. You don't believe in anything so that is your religion. If you are an atheist...that is you relgion. If you believe in evolution...that is your religion. Look up the definition of religion. It is a belief system. Your argument is old outdated and pathetic. If you believe in nothing and someone told you that your daughter means nothing and your momma means nothing, well in this case you may want to fight. So, yes you are correct religion leads to war. Now, do you have another point to discuss? How about a view that will not easily get shot down? Why do you fear the majority? You want laws built around your religion of secularism or whatever it is, you should do what is necessary to become the majority. Are you implying that you do not have the power of Jesus to brainwash millions? Since you probably believe we are brainwashed. I think you are jealous because you don't have convincing powers as Jesus did and still does. You lose

So you quote a white suppremist to support your bullshit reply? You're hanging with dangerous minds...this guy is as bad as Ann Coulter or that phat phuck Limpballs.

Do you even know about the author?

I have been asked to discuss with you tonight the grave social and biological problem presented by that noisy band of persons who currently call themselves "liberal intellectuals." It is not a new problem. The contemporary specimens have inherited the whole of their little stock of phrases and notions, which they are pleased to call "ideas," from their predecessors in the 18th Century, when they called themselves *philosophes*, since France was the country in which they were then making the most noise. But they represent a biological tendency which you can trace back historically until you see that it is much older than civilization itself.

That there may be no misunderstanding, let me make it clear that tonight I shall consistently use the word "intellectual" within quotation marks as the designation that a group of persons have given themselves. I shall not use the word as a common noun with its correct English meaning. If we used the word in that sense, we could do little more than agree with Ayn Rand, who, in a recent book, says quite bluntly:



"Our present state of cultural disintegration is not maintained and prolonged by intellectuals as such, but by the fact that *we haven't any*. The majority of those who pose as 'intellectuals' today are frightened zombies, posturing in a vacuum of their own making.... The key to their souls is their longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. They dread the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition."



So tonight we shall talk about "*intellectuals*."

The problem, however, is particularly urgent today. It concerns all of us. As we all know, the Communist takeover of the United States, now in progress, would have been impossible, had not the self-styled "intellectuals" done so much of the Conspiracy's work for it. But Bolshevism is a subject that we cannot consider tonight, for I must limit myself strictly to "liberal intellectuals" as distinct from members of the International Conspiracy, although I admit that in many cases it is very difficult to tell the difference.

We must all cope with "intellectuals' every day, but I particularly hope that the suggestions that I am going to offer may be useful to those members of this audience who are most besieged and harassed.

One of the chief reasons why I permit myself to hope that our nation may yet survive and have a future is the fact that among the hordes that swarm over college campuses these days there is a considerable number -- even a large number -- of students, who, amid many obstacles and difficulties, are trying to ascertain for themselves the nature of the world in which they live. Every campus, of course, also has its rabble of young "liberals," who are forever making a din as they "demonstrate" for "world peash," "snivel rights," and the like, and who, if we may judge from their appearance and their yammering, are as afraid of war as they are of soap.

I am sure that every student here present fully understands the importance of staying on the good side of the young "intellectuals" -- I mean the windward side, of course.

The student's real difficulty arises from the fact that the self-styled "liberal intellectuals," by methods described in the two books (*Keynes At Harvard* and *The Great Deceit*) published by the Veritas Foundation, have attainted a strangle-hold on American education, and very few college students can escape the ministrations of the "liberal" professor, who urges or requires them to follow him down the rabbit hole or behind the looking glass into the Wonderland in which "intellectuals" live, and in which the hapless student must emulate the White Queen, who, you will remember, was able, with just a little practice, to believe six impossible things before breakfast every mornig.

Now, a serious examination of the problem of "liberal intellectuals" must, I believe, begin with recognition of one fundamental fact -- that we are dealing with the phenomenon that is know in biology as *symbiosis*. In other words, we are examining not one species, but two, that are interdependent, just as in the example of symbiosis that will come to everyone's mind: many species of ants maintain aphids in their nests, and in such an arrangement, the ants could not live without the aphids nor the aphids without the ants.

As I have said, I consider this symbiosis as the fundamental fact in our problem tonight, so let me illustrate it with two or three examples that will make it clear.

In the second half of the 19th Century lived a distinguished French mathematician, Professor Michel Chasles. He was the author of a number of treatises that you will find cited in any reasonably complete work on geometrical theory, prisms, or conic sections. He developed a method of analytical geometry independent of the calculus, and his treatise on the displacement of solids is regarded as a mathematical classic. He was a member of the French Acad‚mie des Sciences, which means that he was recognized as one of the 66 best scientific minds in all France, and he was furthermore the recipient of the highest honor that the Royal Society of London could bestow.

Now Professor Chasles was quite wealthy, and one day there came to him an enterprising young intellectual named Vrain-Lucas, who was -- he said -- a specialist in finding old documents, particularly autographs. He sold the good professor an original letter which proved that Descartes had anticipated all the discoveries of Newton. Professor Chasles was elated to be the possessor of a document of such vast significance in the history of science, and his appetite was whetted for more. So he made Vrain-Lucas promise to bring to him all his sensational finds. Vrain-Lucas did; he supplied remarkable documents, first, one at a time, then by the dozen, and then by the score.

Continued...

http://www.stormfront.org/rpo/LIBERALS.htm

I hate to tell you this, but there is only one TRUE LIVING GOD, who is the Father of Jesus Christ.
This Country wasn't founded to be a Christian Country, but it was Founded on Christian principles, the laws and the Constitution were based on Christian principles....

But the Constitution allows for anyone to believe anything they want to here and practice any religion they wish, but their religious beliefs don't trump the constitution. the people who wrote the constitution didn't know a big part of the country would become atheists, and have all these new religions that are made up come to be. otherwise I'm sure they would have been more precise in the words they wrote...

Look at all the statues etc etc. from back then that was part of government places the were all based on Christianity

-

TATER -YOU GOT IT EXACTLY RIGHT.

Sounds like Zap is totally INTOLERANT.They teach homosexuality and other immoral crap. No morality IS immorality.
Zap sounds like the kind of person who blocks his ears when going by a church service.Hate to see him on Christmas.

Battle Hymn of the Republic

In the beauty of the lillies, Christ was born across the sea,

With a glory in His bosom that transfigures you and me.

As He died to make mn holy, let us die to make men free.

His truth is marching on.
********
America has a mission. Sorry you don't get it.

If fzappa had lived a few centuries ago, he would instead be saying, "God help us, this man does not believe the earth is the center of the universe!" He would be like the Catholic bishops who would not look through a telescope.

Fzappa is a True Believer, just of another sort. Any deviation from his own faith is Heresy, and he responds to such blasphemy accordingly, just like the Christians he derides so much do another sort of blasphemy.

How old is this plant?

(just checking to see to what extent religious teachings can cause brain damage)

he didn't ask a question actually, but i think we know what was implied:

Quote from fzappa:
So you ARE a white supremacist then. That explains a lot.....

He is asking you if you are a white supremacist, which would be:

Are you a white supremacist?

*******************************

And next time don't forget to end your italics and bolding. You use I and/or B, not [/a].

if you can teach your values/morals ( or lack of ) to my children
i should be allowed to teach mine to yours ..... or .....

just teach children the 3 r's and leave the rest to the parents !!

Icon,

Your posts are too long winded.

Why not just write a book?