| 4/29/2008 9:43:12 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | | 
flyingdutchman
San Diego, CA
age: 44
| Scholarly articles are written with references and are reviewed and edited by experts in their fields on the topics being written about. Having a Ph. D doesn't make for a scholarly work.
And you think I would reveal my 30 years of education here to you?! 
Do your own homework son- if you are in doubt.
| | 4/29/2008 9:46:06 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | | justme86
Waco, TX
age: 22
| All I ask is sources. You still haven't produced any. Why would I research your conspiracies?
[Edited 4/29/2008 9:52:37 PM]
| | 4/29/2008 9:48:17 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | | 
scorpiomoon
Brattleboro, VT
age: 59
| I didn't get a SS card until I got my first job at 16, that was in the 1960's Now all three of my grandchildren have a SS# and they are all under 5, and obviously not working!
| | 4/29/2008 9:55:07 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | |
flyingdutchman
San Diego, CA
age: 44
| justme86,
Frederick Mann, is the editor.
I'm certain that with your computer capabilities that you can research Social Security by simply plugging that into your browser.
Now go do your homework before I give you a 'F'
| | 4/29/2008 9:56:51 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | | justme86
Waco, TX
age: 22
| Do I get extra credit for showing you where you can put that 'F'?
I can still edit. I guess only derogative platitudes applies to everyone except you. I'm not surprised.
[Edited 4/29/2008 10:13:43 PM]
| | 4/29/2008 10:03:31 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | |
flyingdutchman
San Diego, CA
age: 44
| Do I get extra credit for showing you where you can put that 'F'?
I only give one warning, and you had yours ~ bye bye justme86,
| | 4/29/2008 10:07:46 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | |
flyingdutchman
San Diego, CA
age: 44
| scorpiomoon,
Your straw man (Strawman) is an artificial person created by law at the of your birth, the inscription of an ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS NAME on your birth certificate/document, which is a document of title and a negotiable instrument. Your lawful, Christian name of birthright was replaced with a legal, corporate name of deceit and fraud. Your name in upper and lower case letters (Jane Mary Doe) has been answering when the legal person, your name in ALL-CAPTIAL LETTERS (JANE MARY DOE), is addressed, and therefore the two have been recognized as being one and the same. When, you Jane Mary Doe, the lawful being distinguish yourself as another party than the legal person, the two will be separated.
Legally, since your birth your artificial person has been considered a slave or indentured servant to the various federal, provincial and municipal governments via your STATE-issued, STATE-created birth certificate in the name of your all-caps person. Your birth certificate was issued so that the issuer could claim "exclusive" title to the legal person created. This was further compounded when you voluntarily obtained a driver's license and a SSN (Social Security Number). The state even owns your personal and private life through your STATE-issued marriage license/certificate issued in the all-caps names. You have had no rights in birth, marriage, nor will you have them even in death unless you re-capture your straw man. (The names on tombstones in cemeteries are in all-caps.) The STATE holds the title to your legal person it created via your birth certificate, until Jane Mary Doe, the rightful owner, the holder in due course of the instrument, that is yourself, reclaims/redeems it.
| | 4/29/2008 10:31:07 PM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | | allyours4now
Glendale, AZ
age: 36
| someday, if he is lucky and a little smarter than average, the boy will learn to think for himself. welfare works in the same way. it does amaze me how little people pay attention to the meaning of words. like the differences of "liberty" and "licence" and how that may effect their life.
| | 4/30/2008 7:23:47 AM | The Social Security system is a conspiracy to enslave the innocent. | |
flyingdutchman
San Diego, CA
age: 44
| "THE SIGNATURE OF A PERSON IS THE PROOF OF HIS CONSENT THAT BINDS HIM UNDER THE LAW OF CONTRACT". Nexus is defined as a connection, tie, or link between individuals of a group. The signature of each person, given voluntarily, binds the U.S. citizenry together into a lifelong socialized contract with the government.
The "law" cannot be invoked when a citizen is not numbered, receives no benefits, and does not enrich himself at the expense of another. Without the law, the court cannot offer a remedy. When a court cannot offer a remedy, the court lacks jurisdiction.
Under the Social Security Act, the citizen is in a state of voluntary servitude. Involuntary servitude is unconstitutional (13th Amendment), but voluntary servitude is constitutional (for every positive action there is a negative reaction). One has the absolute right to enter into a contract and bind himself to specific performance, submitting himself to the law of contracts and to the laws of the contract. Within the U.S., and any place subject to its jurisdiction, no one can force a citizen into a state of involuntary servitude unless for the punishment of crime whereas the party shall have been duly convicted (13th Amendment).
No one can force a citizen into a contractual agreement. The judicial, executive, and legislative branches of the government do not have that power. A tax judge will always remind a litigant that there are no constitutional protection (i.e., right of free speech, privacy) in a tax court (when under contractual obligations). But no judge can order a citizen to participate in the Social Security system. The system is 100% voluntary and whoever joins the system also volunteers into paying the income tax. The following case law describes a valid, constitutionally valid tax return:
"Taxpayer's Internal Revenue Service 1040 forms containing only asterisks denoting constitutional objections constituted "returns" as a matter of law under 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7203." U.S. v. Kimball, CR-86-0017 (1990).
"A sentence compelling a citizen to join under the "Social Security Act" is not a remedy. It would be an act of judicial abuse as a court lacks the authority to do so. Such judicial indiscretion is appealable. Compelling a person to obtain a Social Security number is also invalid. Litigation will only be allowed if the accused had a Social Security number prior to the investigation and litigation.
Where a person has been induced by fraud to make a contract, several alternatives are open to him. He can treat the contract as valid, and sue in tort for the fraud. He can rescind the contract by proceedings in equity, or he can wait until sued upon the contract and set the fraud up as a defense, but at all times, when the fraud is discovered, he must recovery can be had." American Law and Procedure, Vol. I, "Contract."
"Evidence that taxpayer knew he should have filed tax returns, but had made no effort to pay his taxes or get in touch with any official about his income, put question of criminal intent for jury." U.S. v. Sullivan, 98 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1938, N.Y.).
When a fraud is discovered, the plaintiff must put the other party on notice of the fraud, as it applies to his case, and if he benefits from the fraud, no recovery can be had. When the party himself rescinds or repudiates the contract, he merely gives notice by that action to the other party to the contract that he does not propose to be bound by the contract. This he may do by his own action and he needs not turn to the courts. When, however, a court of equity grants rescission or cancellation, it wipes out the instrument, and renders it as though it did not exist; in effect, it tears up the paper and destroys it. A bill in equity to obtain a rescission is not like an action at law brought on the footing of a rescission previously completed; the foundation of the bill is that the rescission is not complete and that the plaintiff asks the aid of the court to make it so. (annot. 95 ALR 1001).
Neither an agent of the government, nor a judge, nor a legislative officer, nor an executive officer, can cancel participation in the Social Security Act of any citizen. Nor is there a provision within the code that permits and/or does not permit a citizen to withdraw from the System. These provisions are lacking because participation in the system is a voluntary contract decided by the individual.
All citizens who have rescinded their social security numbers by resorting to common law proceedings (i.e., by the mere filing of a document of asseveration recorded in the county courthouse) will most likely not be recognized by a court that proceeds in equity. But if the word fraud is implied, he can wait until sued upon and set the fraud up as a defense. If the relief asked is in equity then he who seeks equity must do equity (be given equity). The remedy that exists within the law must come from equity. (Equity: That part of law which administers and adjusts common-law rights where the courts of common law have no machinery.)
The following legal maxims are relevant to the above issues:
"He who affirms must prove".
"If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved."
"The burden of proof lies upon him who affirms."
|
|